« It is doneJust another cog in the machine »

6 comments

  1. § M.O.M. Email said on :
    "The strike goes on, and one must wonder if it still about post retirement benefits, or a monetary gain now, or something more."

    One doesn't have to wonder at all. Right from the beginning the Mayor was manipulating the public via nasty PR tactics. All of the bloggers new it. The local media rolled with it for various reasons (social and monetary). He got caught in public this time. Ask yourself this: Why were PRBs lobbed onto the table in the first place? They were never a part of the collective agreement. They were, pure and simple, a bi-law. The union has no power over that. The strike could have been averted from day one by not including this in the package. All the city had to do then was wait a couple of months and eliminate PRBs via a bi-law ammendment and it would have all gone by with little fanfare. Instead he chose to enflame the union and voila. Here we are $27 million later. Looks good for the city's ailing Standard and Poor rating doesn't it?
  2. § zerodivision® Email said on :
    M.O.M, why did council allow PRB to be on the table, why not stand up to Francis and say no, now is not the time? All the bloggers know that it is a one man show and council gets treated like children. Was there really a unanimous decision for the city's latest offer? If so, why? I have heard this offer was less than the one that was put forth last time and it boggles my mind to see all of council sign off on this laughable offer. I thought this was negotiations anyhow, but I don't see any negotiating going on. CUPE offered to co-pay on PRB's which in my opinion is a sign of good negotiating, a compromise, but no, it gets shot down. When I see council vote down the potential loss of PRB for council members yet still call for the workers to lose them, it pisses me off, it reeks of hypocrisy.

    So why isn't council prepared to eliminate the benefits say in the next meeting? Make a motion to amend the bi-law and get it over with. One obstacle out of the way. Since it never was part of a collective agreement, it can be amended anytime, but why isn't it? Eddie wants to be the one who broke the union by having them concede and include this in their contract that they agree to this.

    When is council going to stand up to this megalomaniac and actually get things settled? He doesn't own this city.

    As for the local media, the bias is obvious for a few obvious reasons, it seems Eddie has his hand in something all over this city.
  3. § M.O.M. Email said on :
    This Mayor is a barb. We all know that. He's been throwing Hail Mary passes since he was elected into office; none of which hit the numbers. Greenlink, the bridge, the tunnel, the jail, the canal, the strike...The closer it gets to the end of his second term the more desperate his plays. He always plays it alone (doesn't need council etc.) and he always plans for a fall guy because he doesn't want any of the crap he tosses to stick on him. By Monday morning we will be hearing yesterdays vote spun out against the union. He will demonize them as thugs who won't move no matter what. Unreasonable and non rational. Funny that. He is the one who from day one drew the line in the sand and hasn't budged. His arrogance will be his downfall. Watch see.
  4. § M.O.M. Email said on :
    Fall guys are in place:

    http://www.windsorstar.com/business/Letter+Skorobohacz+reaches+point+career/1802116/story.html

    Also city legal council.

    Like clock work.
  5. § zerodivision® Email said on :
    So it seems it is in fact about monetary gains now and not prb, which have been taken off the table according to Jean Fox. I am rather disappointed to see CUPE sell out it's future members, but I had this feeling from day 1 that they would eventually cave.

    As far as the fall guys, it was inevitable, Eddie Francis is stupid, yet smart at the same time, he plays a wicked game and always comes out smelling like roses. The more he screws up, the more people flock to his side.
  6. § Theme Parks Email said on :
    Indeed it is a democratic hypocrisy. It is unfortunate though that workers do not earn the sensitivity to their rights.

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
type in the colour listed between the brackets {RED}
antispam test
Contact. ©2010 by $democracy of hypocricy$. open source blog / webhosting / F.P..
Design & icons by N.Design Studio. Skin by Tender Feelings / Evo Factory.